Relationship Analysis Paper Research Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Relationship Analysis - Research publisher ExampleAlthough these numerable theories atomic number 18 not a how to manual, but a means of getting deeper sense into the natures of relationships between human beings. Three of these theories, offer interesting approaches as to how to understand romantic couplings and how and why quite a little participate in interpersonal relationships. Firstly, Social reciprocation Theory, as well as, devil of the conceptual theories that inclination under the umbrella of Social Exchange Theory, Equity Theory and mutualness Theory. History Social Exchange Theory became popularized in the 1960s and 1970s. It works under the principle that all of human relationship behaviors atomic number 18 based on an exchange process. Through this they each lavatory work to maximize rewards and avoids or smirch costs. This mental, and unconscious, a process allow the partners to measure whether their time, energy, money, and efforts balance with what they rec eive (Cherry, 2013). This theory has been influenced and enhanced by behavioural psychology, which explains that human being will repeat the behaviors that have resulted with rewards in the past. As well, as supported by Utilitarian logic, that if one receives more than the other, one will inevitably take advantage of the other (Plunkett, 2013). precisely meaning that one partner in a relationship becomes the aboriginal giver and the other the primary receiver. Once these behaviors become habitual it will likely, not change. Equity Theory is based on the notion that people are innately drawn or desire to be treated well and precious fairly within the relationships they participate. Now, this does not necessarily mean that each partner will contribute in the same ways to the relationship, but as long as the parties involved find the relationship concurring(a) the a sense of balance, fairness, and equality that people wish. Unfortunately, we all do not necessarily agree on the def inition of fairness is. This is when perceived imbalance can occur. When one member is not receiving confirming reinforcements they may abandon the relationship. In turn, it is, also, possible for a partner who feels that the other gives much more than they do they may feel distress or guilt about this imbalance, even when that imbalance is in their favor (Deshmukh, 2011). Interdependence exists when the accomplishment of each individuals goals is affected by the actions of others (qtd. in Johnson & Johnson, 2013). In other actors line the personal successes and failures of each partner can be intertwined with one another. The theory explains that there are two types of Interdependence, positive, or cooperative, and negative, or competitive. Positive and cooperative interdependence is reflected in relationship where both partners feel that they cannot chip in their goals without their partner, also, achieving their goals. Many might consider that the exact example of a committe d, dedicated and equal relationship. The successes and failure are intertwined. Negative interdependence occurs when the partners in a relationship are competitive. Ones success can only be achieved by sacrificing the best interests of the other (Johnson & Johnson, 2013). Interestingly enough, if one partner is seeking positive interdependen