Stance Against Animal Testing

Stance Against Animal TestingEach year, more than than vitamin C meg physicals are killed in U.S. laboratories (Experiments on wildcats Overview). One hundred million per year is an overwhelming arrive considering how little progress is make from puppet testing. There is no justifiable reason for making lively universes suffer when the biological makeup of wolfs and human beingss is so different and there is a plethora of alternatives.Defenseless zoologys are put in an overwhelming amount of annoyance being tested on for mankinds own selfish emolument which is unethical and immoral. They are subjected to the torture of constantly being poked and prodded with needles, forced to acquire/inhale, their skin being burned off, holes drilled into their skull, being isolated and confine to a cage, along with numerous other traumatic experiences until their death, in rundown to having to deal with the after effects of the procedures being inflicted upon them all for experim ents that do non ensure the results will be similar to those of humans. 78,294 animals subjected to severe inconvenience near, at, or above the pain tolerance threshold of unanesthetized conscious animals according to the statistics of Canada in 2013. This is an astonishing amount of animals forced to go by means of agonizing pain for the sake of human research in just one year. Reports settle that even the minimal standards set forth by the AWA are non being met by these facilities This shows that these animals are not even being provided the to the lowest degree bit of comfort or care during these experiments. These animals are being torment and treated inhumanely for the testing of food, drugs, cosmetics, and medical research when the information being collected is not completely close and there are m any other alternatives (Experiments on Animals Overview Peta).Since animals and humans are so different, testing on animals does not correctly show how a drug or chemic wil l react on a human. Animals and humans organs, nervous systems, cellular makeup, and physical bo asphyxiates are not similar enough to be considering an animals reply to something anywhere near the same as a humans competency be. Even if a new chemical entity is deemed safe at animal stage, it solo has an 8 portion chance of being approved for human usage (Ericson) A mere eight percent is not worth taking an animals life over. Currently, nine out of ten experimental drugs bump in clinical studies because we can buoynot accurately predict how they will be hold up in people base on laboratory and animal studies (Experiments on Animals Overview). This is only one out of ten experimental drugs being successful based on animal studies. Millions of animals are being made to suffer and die for barely any progress.There are plenty of new advances in science and technology that provide ways of testing that do not include bringing any harm to animals and give more accurate informatio n. One of these alternatives is called the chemosynthetic colorful. A veteran chemist, Mukund Chorghade, came up with the idea to start with liver cells and created a chemical compound that is the chemosynthetic liver. The chemosynthetic liver has the ability to run a drug through it and tell the exact results of how it would work going through a living human being, making it easier and faster to catch anything wrong. In one sample trial, the chemosynthetic liver caught a particularly nasty metabolite that would have set the developer back millions of dollars and countless hours of research. It did so by providing a take of specificity that would otherwise have required about 1,000 rats and 100 dogs This confirms the staggering discrepancy between using the chemosynthetic liver versus testing on an animal. The method saves not only time and money, but animal lives as well. Though keep mum in its early phase, the method has already proven viable in 50 similar sample studies. This verifies that the chemosynthetic liver has proven to be a reliable way of testing so far, and is worth unless developing.In addition to the chemosynthetic liver another way of testing that is becoming more common is computer modeling. Many researchers now have access to travel computer software capable of mimicking and replicating many of the functions of the human body. These programs allow researchers to field the effects of any changes to the human body without testing these changes on animals By using computer models that can predict human body reactions more precise data is being gathered while sparing animal lives. There is also stem cells, which are cells that can develop into any human tissue or structure. By using stem cells, researchers can create specialized organ tissues to study diseases and other abnormalities without involving any living beings (Alternatives to Animal Testing) Stem cells have the advantage of actually being made into human tissue which is signific antly more accurate than testing on an animal while not causing any harm. This just further proves that there is no need to test on animals with the advanced technology we have today.Since animal testing proves to only have an 8 percent chance of being deemed safe for human usage (Ericson), causes animals excruciating pain and there are alternatives such as the chemosynthetic liver, computer modeling, and stem cells available, animal testing is not needed in this day and age. In conclusion, animal testing is cruel and unnecessary.Works CitedAlternatives to Animal Testing. explore in Context, Gale, 2016. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSICsw=wu=j020902v=2.1id=GALE%7CYODOBR772899801it=rasid=eee040ce3e96ced50100e71b505e0887. Accessed 3 Feb. 2017.Animal Experimentation. Gale disciple Resources in Context, Gale, 2016. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSICsw=wu=j020902v=2.1id=GALE%7CLPQUWH681386081it=rasid=6208c5056307c4d43ea2338d2acc392c. Accessed 3 Feb. 2017.Animal Testing. Gale Student Resources in Context, Gale, 2015. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSICsw=wu=j020902v=2.1id=GALE%7CVWTFPN342363283it=rasid=3563c04c5e6bec653161845916a9d290. Accessed 6 Feb. 2017.Ericson, John. Breakthroughs tycoon Mean the End of Animal Testing. Newsweek, 28 Mar. 2014, p. 1. Research in Context, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=MSICsw=wu=j020902v=2.1id=GALE%7CA362262525it=rasid=382274e7e9beddd55d2ce864c779052e. Accessed 3 Feb. 2017.Experiments on Animals Overview. PETA, PETA, www.peta.org/issues/animals-used-for-experimentation/animals-used-experimentation-factsheets/animal-experiments-overview/.