How Far Do I Agree That the Hundred Flowers Campaign Was a Trick Essay

monoamine oxidase travelled the length and breadth of China during the 1950s. The enormous amount of support that he got where eer he went convinced him that he was in touch with the community. He similarlyk this opportunity to give some great freedom of demonstrateion to his people and he encouraged constructive critical review of how he and his political party were transforming china into a proletarian state. He besides gave intellectuals a greater say in debate which was unusual as Mao hated them.It was quite possible that Mao was affected by the attack on Stalin by Khrushchev who publicly said that Stalin was evil and price Mao did not want this backlash himself . erhaps the one C flowers campaign unlikeable the gap between his people and him, the people would not make a comparison of him and Stalin and it would make him seem that he really cared what the people thought. In early 1957 the party and Mao prepared themselves for criticism which let common every day peop le be able to say where the CCP had deceased wrong. After the initial thoughts of people being classed as anti party were dismissed people flocked in their hundreds to criticise the party top organization officials and even as far as Mao himself on the grounds of corruption, inefficiency and not being realistic.After this Mao changes direction and stops the hundred flowers campaign and everything goes backwards it was not a time of expression exclusively a time of great oppression and was replaced altogether with the anti-rightist movement. Those people who had speak erupt the most about the regime were forced to retract on that point statement and many University staff, writers, school teachers and economists some of the finest minds in china were forced to retract there statements and were humiliated in front of their peers and were forced to submit re-education classes where they were broken down and re built with the information about the CCP. stock-still high ranking g overnment officials were not safe as chuck Enlai found out when he was forced to say that he had been too slow in putting Maos industrial plans into carry out which was not true, this sent out a message to everyone else saying that no one is safe and forcing everyone to conform. Some people say that it was a harlequinade from the start and the speed in which he retracted the campaign and replaced it with the other(a) one shows that it was a trap from the beginning, they also say that it was a knock over measure to bring his critics out in to the public and catch them.He could use what they said against them most of the people who did this were intellectuals and the educated who were the most credibly to speak up these people also happened to be the two ranks of people that Mao didnt like. It was a movement towards a controlled society in which all expression of opinion had to fit within the governments criteria. However. People say that Mao was genuinely seeking criticism in which he would turn the peasants against the other classes.By giving scientists and engineers the freedom to express their ideas Mao sought to hold back party bureaucrats from meddling with technical decisions. He wanted intellectuals to expose and attack corruption and bureaucracy. He also wanted peasants, students and workers to speak out and even demonstrate to pr topic government bureaucrats from running roughshod over their rights. Another theory is that Mao did it on a whim and he did not set out with an agenda and was the quick thinking of CCP party main officials.In the event Maos motives may or may not kick in been, it was the scale of the criticism that it unleashed that took him aback, he had not realized the size of the problems that his ever so perfect regime had. Whether or not he had set out flush out opponents it had the same outcome, he had discovered the period of the opposition. He crushed those who he thought were opposed to him. So yes I think that the hundr ed flowers campaign was a trick used by Mao to flush out opponents. the ruthlessness the he showed can merely mean that he set out to do it in the first of all place.