Comparing Walton and Victor

Comp are the components of Victor and Walton as Shelley presents them in the early deducts of the reinvigorated. What kindredities are there between the characters and quests? In the early ch appositeers of Frankenstein by Mary Shelley the character of Walton is introduced by a series of letters he is writing to his baby back in London (the whole novel is an epistolary structure) as he is on a voyage to the North Pole in hope of fulfilling his goal of a breakthrough scientific discovery and discovering just about of natures most profound secrets.Walton is full of hope and scientific curiosity and a passionate determination that he will turn over his goals I sh every satiate my ardent curiosity with the sight of a part of the world never before visited, and may tread a pop never before imprinted by the foot of man he emergencys to right himself apart from other scientists and discover something altogether new, something that will bring him fame and contingency and ensure th at he is remembered forever- he is on a journey that-he learns posterior in the novel-may non turn out to be the success that he vox populi it was, and his ardent curiosity may be his d sufferfall in the end.His loneliness (I feel the bitter want of a ally) is subsided when a man on the brink of decease is brought upon the ship, half utterly and wretched. The man they bring on board-Frankenstein- bears a lot of similarities to Walton, from their aspirations and dispatch obsession to discover the undiscovered.There is however, one major difference between these 2 characters-Frankenstein has already been in Waltons shoes and has already experienced the consequences of his endeavours-and they were non pleasant, as he relays the story to Walton, warning him how he has suffered great and unparal lead misfortunes through his seeking of familiarity and wisdom and comprehend Walton do the same, he warns him of the dangers of knowledge and tells of his story-his parents, his wonder ful childhood, his thirst for knowledge and, most important of all, his psychoneurotic scientific curiosity that led him to make the choices he made that were ultimately his downfall.He has versed from them, a little to a fault late, and he only hopes that Walton will attentiveness his warning about the dangers of knowledge, and non make the same mistakes that he did, that led to his destruction. Shelley made the characters so similar in ambition and character that this evokes the thought of the doppelganger, a popular theme amongst gothic literature. Frankenstein is almost Waltons doppelganger- everything he is, bright, mbitious-but also everything that he doesnt want to become- a wretch, a man haunted by his choices and on the brink of destruction, all because of his desire to become recognised among the scientific world and leave his fructify on the world. Because of Frankensteins story Walton witnesses what the danger of knowledge can do and warns him-a kindness no one cou ld do to Frankenstein-to not follow in his footsteps exposing him to the same dangers as he did.Frankenstein feels as he has unleashed such a horror into the world, the least he can do is to prevent some other like-minded person making the same mistakes he did, and through that, not founder his and countless lives, as if he has been so fortunate as to shit someone relay their story about knowledge and destruction before he made the choices he did, he may support rethought his priorities and still be living a happy biography afterward the novels end. In short, Frankenstein was doing Walton a kindness by retelling his tragical story and that brings about another characteristic that Shelley wrote them to two have-they are both(prenominal) unassailable men.They are deeply affectionate to their close ones heaven exhibitioner down blessings on you my beloved sister, mine to love and love, and their obsession fuelled by a desire to benefit the world. This evokes sympathy both in the reader and Walton, when he hears Frankensteins tragic twaddle-how a safe man with good intentions can make choices so catastrophic that they ruin the lives of those closest to them and themselves-maybe this is why in the end Walton decides to turn back? both men are also linked with one massive similarity-they both have an incredibly obsessive, if somewhat selfish, nature.Some of Waltons first words in the letters are If I fail you will see me concisely or never he is determined that this voyage will be a success, and is prepared to die for the cause. This mirrors Frankensteins feelings later on in the novel stars would often disappear in the night sky magic spell I worked in my laboratory-Frankensteins obsession with discovery had him get-up-and-go himself to the limit to accomplish his goals, sacrificing time and health, at any cost as long as he succeeded.That cost, he finds out eventually, is too high, and seeing Walton with the same obsessive nature, going on a voya ge that is potentially life-threatening, he wishes him to break-dance and think thoroughly about whether it is worth it, something that he failed to do, as no one had interfered when he was creating the creature and warned him of the dangers, and as it is too late to repair his mistakes, he can stop Walton from letting his obsessive nature rule him-I imagine that you may deduce an apt moral from my tale- as it did Frankenstein.Walton and Frankenstein are two very similar men-both have passion, dumbfound and determination that set them apart from other men, and institutionalise them a dangerous obsessive edge. Frankenstein has learned from his mistakes and has accepted his fate nonentity can alter my destiny, and wants to make sure that another good man, so much like himself does not make the same life altering decisions that he did, searching blindly for knowledge that may be dangerous to uncover, so he retells his story to Walton in the hope of preventing him destroying his lif e.Walton with his drive at first in the letters to his sister mentions that does he not deserve to accomplish some great purpose? he believes he deserves success and has worked and will work impossibly hard to ensure his labours do not go unrecognised. But Walton also mentions that he feels the bitter want of a friend to approve or amend my plans.His prayers were answered in the anatomy of Frankenstein, and after his tale of woe Walton finally decides to turn back and ravage his voyage-he listened to Frankenstein, as a brother of my heart and as an older adjustment of him that has failed. Now, the reader wonders, if Frankenstein had the same great luck as Walton to find someone with the same drive and obsession to retell his story to him and make him stop and think thoroughly if he is doing the right thing? Would he have still made the creature?Or would he have halt and be living happily with his living family long after the novels end? This, perhaps, is the greatest difference between Frankenstein and Walton. Walton had an older, wiser version of himself retelling his tale of misfortune that stopped Walton and potentially saved him. Frankenstein did not have that extravagance of someone older and wiser intervening in his work, so he move carrying out his work, putting in it all of his hopes and dreams, when in reality, he was creating his own destruction.