'“Othello” and “A Doll’s House”\r'

'In either stratum, we often ingest a colorful component part in the constellation of the story’s antagonist. They are usually held in contrast to the story’s primary(prenominal) character or the lifter. This is how the antagonists were portrayed in twain the stories â€Å"Othello” and â€Å"A Doll’s House.” The antagonists of the stories were set in coincidence to the respective protagonists. On both these stories, the antagonists played a great part in destroying the knowing marriages of both protagonists. Through their schemes and art objectipulation, they were able to destroy what these people held so dearly: their relationships with their loved ones.In William Shakespeare’s â€Å"Othello,” Iago plays the antagonist role, oppose the position of Othello. Iago is depicted as one of Othello’s men, since the latter holds a high position which the antecedent serves. When Iago felt that another man was favored deflex ion from him, he planned to take Othello nap by destroying his happy marriage with Desdemona (Shakespeare).In the story, we can see that Iago’s source of motivation in his schemes when Othello favors his lieutenant Cassio kind of than his Ancient and ensign, Iago. It was jealousy that made him conceive every evil schemes and plans that he came up with. As the story’s antagonist, we can articulate that Iago is very crafty with his plans, managing to bulgewit other characters and making them his â€Å"tools” to bring d birth Othello. He was very successful in manipulating the main character, making him believe that his wife was cheating on him.Analyzing the motives of Iago, we can say that his debates were very shallow. It was his jealousy that direct to the dash things happened. provided there was no psyche to be jealous about. He has a nice position in Othello’s men. The way he see Cassion being favored more than him was estimable superficial, since it was him that Othello believed about. If Othello didn’t believe him, then the story wouldn’t have led to the way it went. simply Othello confidences Iago. He believes him so much that it has led to the destruction of his happy marriage, his downfall, his wife’s death, and eventually, his own death.The person who suffered the most in this story was Othello. With Iago’s schemes, Othello lost his trust in his wife. His faith in their relationship crumbled as Iago stirred up his purviews. As a man of his stature, Othello need not be faithless with his wife. But because of his insecurities, Iago managed to toy with his emotions. As a â€Å"different” man, Othello thought that his wife was not satisfied with him. He was the tie down of Venice, a dark skinned man in the land of whites. Because of these insecurities, his suspicions grew to hatred. That hatred ca employ him to kill Desdemona unaccompanied to make out afterwards that it was a ll Iago’s doings.In Henrik Ibsen’s â€Å"A Doll’s House,” the main protagonist was Krogstad, who was on the brink of losing his byplay. He was an employee of the main character, Torvald. Torvald is the husband of Nora Helmer, and their relationship as a married pas de deux is an example of a happy marriage for the society. But the happiness didn’t last for long, as short as Krogstad schemed his way from getting himself fired from the mi literatureary control he didn’t requirement to lack (Ibsen).Krogstad’s reasons for his actions were all rooted to him keeping his job. It was very unhappy that he knows a secret of Nora Helmer. He used this secret to try and save himself from getting fired. It was Nora’s head who’s on the line, fearing that her secret cleverness be discovered by others, especially her husband. The only favor Krogstad asked in modify for his silence was for Nora to incline his husband not to fire him. However, all of Nora’s efforts were futile, not being able to save Krogstad his job. Because of this, Krogstad chose to let on Nora’s well kept secret, at the expenditure of Nora and Torvald’s happy marriage. After all, Krogstad has nothing to lose anymore.Looking at Krogstad’s reason for his actions, we can say that he is on the edge, that’s why he was forced to blackmail Nora honest to save him. It was his job on the line, and he really didn’t want to use it. The fact that he knows something that Nora has kept so much for herself was not his discretion. It was the only option he has, and he chose to use that option well, in exchange for everything that he might lose. Krogstad may be seen as a bad man, but his actions show that it was urgency that forced him to do what he has done. This doesn’t use up anything about keeping Nora’s secret just to save her shame or marriage. It was his own battle, and he must fight wi th everything he has. The only artillery unit he has in store at that clock was Nora’s secret.We can say that the antagonists of the story had their way with the protagonists. They were able to blindly manipulate anyone in tack together to have their biddings fulfilled. In the end, it was all misery for the protagonist, from each one with crumbling relationships as both the stories closed. No matter what their reason may be, these antagonists were able to make the most out of every situation turning it into something advantageous for their own benefits.Works Cited:Ibsen, Henrik. â€Å"A Dolls House”.  1879.  Spark Notes. October 7 2007. <http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/dollhouse/>.Shakespeare, William. â€Å"Othello”.  1603.  Spark Notes. October 7 2007. <http://www.sparknotes.com/shakespeare/othello/>.\r\n'