Pre-calculus

PRECALCULUS - MATRICESPrecalculus - MatricesPRECALCULUS - MATRICES varlet 1 OF 4The invention of matrices has often been credit to a Japanese mathematician named Seki Kowa . In a scholarly flirt he cropered in 1683 he discussed his study of magic squ ars and what would come to be called determinates . Gottfried Leibniz would also independently write on matrices in the exact late 1600s (O Conner and Robertson 1997 ,. 1The reality is that the concept of matrices predates these fairly modern mathematicians by about 1600 eld . In an ancient Chinese trail text titled Nine Chapters of the Mathematical Art , pen quondam(prenominal) between 300 BC and 200 AD , the author Chiu Chang Suan Shu provides an framework of utilize hyaloplasm operations to solve co-occurrent equations . The base of a determinate appears in the w ork s 7th chapter , come up over a thousand years beforehand Kowa or Leibnitz were credited with the idea . Chapter eight is titled Methods of rectangular Arrays . The rule described for solving the equations utilizes a counting room that is same to the modern mode of solution that Carl Gauss described in the 1800s That method , called Gaussian ejection , is credited to him , almost 1800 years later on its true (Smoller 2001 ,. 1-4In what we will call Gaussian Elimination (although it right salutaryy should be called Suan Shu Elimination , a governance of linear equations is scripted in hyaloplasm form . Consider the dodging of equations This is wander into intercellular substance form as three divers(prenominal) matrices PRECALCULUS - MATRICES page 2 OF 4 . But it can be puzzle out without using matrix multiplication directly by using the Gaussian Elimination procedures .

First , the matrices A and C ar joined to form one augmented matrix as such A series of elementary courseing operations are wherefore used to reduce the matrix to the course of instruction echelon form This matrix is therefore written as three equations in conventional form The equations are then solved consecutive by substitution , starting by substituting the chousen look on of z (third equation ) into the guerilla equation , solving for y , then substituting into the offset printing equation , then solving for x , yielding the 1993 , pp 543-553Before we foreshorten all of this work , it is important to determine if the dodging of equations has a solution , or has an infinite number of solutions . As an example of a formation o f equations that has no solution consider this dust of linear equations PRECALCULUS - MATRICES PAGE 3 OF 4Written in the augmented matrix form , this system isMultiply words 1 by -2 and kick in it to row 2Multiply row 1 by -2 and chalk up it to row 3Swap row 2 and row 3Multiply row 2 by -5 and add it to row 3Multiply row 3 by -1 /10Multiply class 2 by -2 Since the reduced matrix has an equation we know to be false , 0 1 , we know that this system does not have a solution (Demana , Waits Clemens 1993 , pp 543-553PRECALCULUS - MATRICES PAGE 4 OF quarto illustrate a system...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper